Latest Stories

Most recently published stories in Confessions.

He Hit Me First. Content Warning.
I had a C-PTSD episode in the middle of the night. Writing it down is one of many things that helps me process sometimes, and it occurred to me that it may or may not be helpful for some to read. I’m hoping it might.
By Dana Mary Colleen Campbell6 days ago in Confessions
Confession: I Get Drunk
They say, "Confessions are good for the soul." This article is my confession about a personal habit I regularly practice.
By Margaret Minnicks6 days ago in Confessions
Wheat and weeds, Part 7
We’ve just sat for hours with someone ‘confidently’ dismantling a story that, for a lot of people, is tied to childhood, family, morality, meaning. Even if you’re not a believer, there’s a weight to watching someone rip through it with “hidden history” and “they never told you this.” It’s very normal to feel a mix of fascination, anger, relief, or even a kind of vertigo after that. You’re not overreacting if it shook you.
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.6 days ago in Confessions
Wheat and weeds, Part 6
The Prometheus material is similar. There are indeed fascinating thematic parallels between Prometheus and later ideas of Satan or Lucifer: a figure who defies the high god, brings knowledge or fire to humans, suffers for it, is bound and tormented. Ancient authors themselves sometimes played with these resonances. But those are literary and philosophical parallels, not genealogical ones. There is no historical chain that runs “Enki → Prometheus → Satan → Jesus,” as if these were successive masks of the same being. The video treats them that way, because it is always looking for a single hidden pattern, but that is a choice of interpretation, not something the sources force on you.
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.6 days ago in Confessions
Wheat and weeds, Part 5
The conversation felt weak and unbalanced; The interlocutor in that video often doesn’t know basic historical facts. And that’s not my imagination. When someone with weak historical grounding interviews someone who is very confident but not academically trained, the result is exactly what I sensed: a conversation that sounds bold and revolutionary but collapses the moment one check it against real scholarship.
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.6 days ago in Confessions
Wheat and weeds, Part 4
To be even more explicit: 1.About Epiphanius, the Panarion, and heresiology When scholars study Epiphanius, they do not rely on Wikipedia. They use the critical editions and commentaries published by Brill, Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, and similar academic houses. The standard English translation of the Panarion is by Frank Williams, published by Brill. Williams’ introduction explains in detail that Epiphanius is a polemical writer whose descriptions of heretical groups must be read with caution.
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.6 days ago in Confessions
Wheat and weeds, Part 3
Extra points i thought to bring to your attention: When I said modern scholarship on heresiology and the Panarion is clear that Epiphanius is polemical, I’m thinking of people like Frank Williams, who produced the standard English translation of the Panarion for Brill, with a long introduction explaining Epiphanius’ methods and biases; of Averil Cameron, who has written extensively on late antique Christian polemic; and of David Brakke, whose work on Gnosticism and heresiology (for example “The Gnostics” and his studies on Athanasius and Egyptian monasticism) shows how heresiologists constructed enemies rhetorically. These are the kinds of names you’d see in university syllabi, not just on Wikipedia.
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.6 days ago in Confessions
Wheat and weeds, Part 2
Why Epiphanius looks “clean” online but sounds extreme in the video Epiphanius lived in the 4th century, long after Jesus, long after Paul, and long after the earliest Christian communities. By his time, Christianity had become institutionalized, and the Church was trying to define orthodoxy and eliminate competing interpretations.
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.6 days ago in Confessions
Wheat and weeds
The conversation from a podcast, i saw last week, explores how some of the earliest Christian writings and alternative traditions paint a very different picture of God and Jesus than what later mainstream Christianity adopted. The host and guest discuss how certain ancient groups, especially Gnostic thinkers, believed the creator figure in the Old Testament was not the ultimate divine source but a flawed or even harmful being. In their view, Jesus appears not as the obedient son of this creator but as a messenger from a higher, hidden reality who comes to free humanity from ignorance.
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.6 days ago in Confessions
Situationship Boundaries Help Prevent Confusion In Casual Romantic Connections
Modern dating has been characterized by the rise of situations where relationships are formed between friendship and committed relationships which are termed as situationships. The dynamics may be emotional closeness, similar experiences, even physical intimacy, but do not have definite labels or expectations. Although this may be a liberating aspect, it also brings in ambiguity. In the absence of defined roles, a person can find it difficult to determine the kind of relationship and end up being confused about the intentions, limits, and emotional commitment in the long run.
By Robert Smith6 days ago in Confessions
Dating Psychology Explains Why Mixed Signals Create Emotional Attachment Quickly
Mixed signals in dating include a scenario where the actions and words of the individual lack consistency making it hard to determine what the individual intends. As an illustration, an individual can be interested by sending messages or showing affection and then leave or grow distant without any reason. This contradiction makes the other party confused on where he or she has to be. The problem of mixed signals is becoming more prevalent in the contemporary dating world in which communication over the Internet is so easily manipulated, stalled, or downplayed that no one holds a clear responsibility of being accountable or emotionally responsible.
By Robert Smith6 days ago in Confessions
Kely, the Character Who carries My Adventures
Kely wasn’t born from a plan, a literary concept, or the intention to craft a strong character. She appeared the way certain encounters do in life: without warning, without logic, yet with a troubling sense of inevitability. At first, I thought she would be nothing more than a narrative vessel, an excuse to explore a world that was freer, more sensual, more unapologetic.
By CECILE HEBELLE7 days ago in Confessions